The Hidden History | FREEDOM MATTERS

My Take On The Last Six Years of Political Turmoil

Posted on 2020/07/12 by Neil Howard Posted in English, Politics and War, The Hidden History

Here is my take on the last six years. Being in Colombia, as I am in the same time zone as the East Coast of America, I am more inclined to be very attentive to the US News.

Some six years ago, everything was moving along in the World, with the usual concerns but, in the main, THE PEOPLE got on with their lives without too much aggravation. It would be fair to say that the Politics of the US and UK were kept within the political circle of MPs, MEP., Senators and Congress people. THE PEOPLE were very aware that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. THE PEOPLE understood that people in power became very wealthy through corrupt practices. The British MPs fiddled their expenses, some fiddled deals through the MEP system, some were given Knighthoods. THE PEOPLE complained, but they had no support from the BBC or the Media, apart from the emerging you-tubers. What THE PEOPLE did not understand was that industrial scale corruption had taken root in both the US and UK. What THE PEOPLE did understand was the rise of populism. The irony, here, is the dictionary definition of populism and the definition which elites spout to THE PEOPLE. Here is the OXFORD Dictionary definition of Populism, “”A political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups“”. Exactly how the PEOPLE feel today. However, the definition gives an example “‘the question is whether he will tone down his fiery populism now that he has joined the political establishment'” What does that tell a reader?

The PEOPLE understood that the elites had a program on immigration, on foreign policy, on an economy that just simply did not work for average people and the more the elites procrastinated, the angrier the people got, and the less the elites were willing to listen. There came two events that split, first, the UK right down the middle and, then, the US right down the middle. Those two events heralded the end of Globalization and uncontrolled immigration. Those two events: BREXIT and the nomination for the 45th President of the USA The statistics show that a 50%/50% of both the US and UK populations want their countries to proceed under two very different ideologies. One ideology, the one that the Pilgrims followed in the UK and took to the New World, was one based on the absolute freedom of the Citizen. The other was one that has long been discussed by the young, and believers in a utopia, of a system that collects the fruit of all labour, from all Citizens, and then shares out the fruits equally amongst all. This later ideology is very appealing to the young, inexperienced, illiterate and ignorant. It is a lazy way out of taking responsibility for oneself, whilst virtue signalling what a caring, sharing person you are.

As I had worked in Libya for some time, I kept an eye on events in that country and it had been many years before, that a US compound had been attacked and senior US diplomats had been killed. It was, at a time, when Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton were in power and the attack went against the best interests of Obama’s foreign policy on Libya. On the night of the attack, Hilary Clinton, as US Foreign Secretary, had the power to send in US forces, which were local to Libya, to assist. She hesitated, and in that hesitation, the US compound in Libya was overrun and the deaths of senior US personnel took place. Clinton needed to protect her reputation and the reputation of Obama’s policy on Libya, and so she instructed Susan Rice to stand in front of the TV cameras of the US media and, then, tell the US People that the attack was the direct result of an anti-Islamic video released in the previous few days. A false statement All this is history, and of no real interest to THE PEOPLE. However, Hilary Clinton had made a huge error when she took the security of the US for granted. As Secretary of State she must have believed she was untouchable. When she was appointed as Secretary of State she undertook to carry out all her actions within the law , however, in her position as Secretary of State she needed to keep her lines of communication open whilst within the law of the USA. The Clintons had already operated a corrupt network before Hilary Clinton became Secretary of State and, in her position, other people, not of US citizenship, sought to use the office of Secretary of State to their own ends in a process called “Pay to Play”. Just before this came to light, the fact that Hilary Clinton had installed a device, called a server, in the basement of her own home, was unknown, and, through this private server which was not subject to government security, she conducted her government business and her private business. There was no firewall between business and private.

Hilary Clinton had a person working for her, a secretary if you like, named Huma Abidin. In turn, Huma Abidin had a husband, Anthony Weiner, who had a weakness for young underage girls. Huma Abidin’s husband was into sending indecent photos of himself to young women and the mother of one particular girl intercepted the indecent photographs. As the man sending the photographs was a congressman, it would be very easy to conclude that compensation (blackmail if you will) could be sought against the congressman for his intrusion into the life of an under age girl. The mother, then, raised her concern to the police and, as Anthony Weiner was a congressman, he soon became subject to a high level investigation. The case against Clinton was well underway when the Anthony Weiner affair came to light. Clintons use of a private server was disclosed when US intelligence was carrying out an investigation of the deaths of the people in the Libyian compound. Hilary Clinton used multiple devices to route through the server and, in doing so, she had broken many laws. When subpoenaed to hand over all of her devices she had them bleached bitted and, then, all smashed up. However, Anthony Weiner’s laptop, also, contained government classified documents which had been forwarded through the Clinton server.

In the months before Hilary Clinton expected to be crowned the 45th President of the USA she had this email scandal, her Sword of Damocles, hanging over her. In a parallel and developing situation, Donald Trump had raised his profile of a successful businessman who could, also, challenge Hilary Clinton. However, none of the mainstream media believed Donald Trump would beat Hilary Clinton. To my knowledge the only person, that I was aware of, who believed that Donald Trump would beat Hilary Clinton, was Ann Coulter and I, also, believed Donald Trump had a great chance of beating Hilary Clinton. At some time, even Hilary Clinton began to be concerned. She must have been very concerned as she set in motion a train of events which would lead to where the World is today, a complete mess. Without doubt, Hilary Clinton would have had sharp words with Obama, about the risk from Trump, and from those sharp words a contract was placed with Fusion GPS who placed a contract with the company operated by an ex MI6 man Christopher Steele. In parallel, Hilary Clinton let it be known that if Trump won, and she lost, she would take “them” all down with her. Her stated position was well understood by those she had managed for the previous 4 years.

The World is well aware that Donald Trump gained the office of the 45th President and then, the problems really started for the World. However, before he stepped into the office of the President, the knives were out. The office of the 45th President was to be eliminated, one way or another by the FBI, the CIA, the intelligence committee led by the Democrats, the BBC, the Guardian news, and the labour party of the UK. The overriding question was, “What were the driving forces attempting to eliminate the 45th President.?” I believe the major driving force was that the Obama government had carried out many corrupt actions and Hilary Clinton had been part of this corrupt regime, gathering in millions and millions from her position as Secretary of State. For three plus years, the senior members of the FBI, CIA, DOJ and the other branches of the US government have conspired together to stop Trump carrying out his dismantling of a growing and corrupt socialist state.

Donald Trump, I believe, genuinely wished to work a deal with China to the mutual benefit of both the US and China. Trump was very aware that the practices of China broke the norms of free trade but for years ago THE PEOPLE could see that China was a dangerous country to allow to fail and it was best if THE PEOPLE encouraged China to be an International and outward looking country rather than inward and isolationist. The West’s problem is that the West has been led by people who are far too trusting and ready to believe lies. Too ready to forgive and maybe just to ignorant that the West was losing the economic battle with China and, in losing the economic battle with China, would lose the cultural battle and any other battle that the Chinese wished to stage. However, it could be that some politicions, in positions of power, did a reverse “pay for play”. So, whilst the Democratic Party, the FBI, CIA, Doj, BLM and Antifa all attempted to pull the Bull down, China slipped the World a “Mickey”, in the form of Coronavirus. Whether it was a conscious act or otherwise, it is understood, by those with any common sense, that the fabrication of the virus coming out of a sea food market was a fallacy and, according to Western specialists, the virus had been engineered.
However, the virus was on the streets of the World and, at that point, any sane person would carry out sane actions to bring the spread of the virus under control and, then, eliminate it. However, these are insane times and a saying of late is “never let a good crisis go to waste”. Accordingly, looking at the crisis from a Democrat point of view would see the crisis in a very different light from a Republican point of view and both would be different from the view taken by the 45th President of the USA..

Early in the pandemic outbreak. leaders of the International community looked to the World Health Organization for guidance. The Head of the WHO issued a statement that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has got it under control. However, no independent authority was allowed into China to confirm that the CCP had got it under control. The major means to bring the virus under control would be to ring fence the area of contamination and prevent people crossing that ring fence. However, that is exactly what the CCP did not do. In fact, it was a major Chinese holiday and no warnings or restrictions, of any description, were put in place. It was notable, later, that Beijing did not suffer the virus to any great degree. Had undisclosed precautions taken place, beforehand. Conclusions were arrived at, maybe false, that the CCP , a) knowingly made no attempt to stop the spread as it was out of control in China and, therefore, to protect China, economically, the rest of the World should be made to feel the same effects or b) the release of the virus was a rehearsal for a more significant release.

Over on the shores of the USA, the economy was booming and in better condition than had ever been experienced before. It was expected that by November 2020 the sitting 45th President would be re-elected for a second term. The Democrats had been humiliated in their attempts to bring the bull down. Legally they had failed and illegally they had failed. Then came manna from heaven for the Democrats, the CCP virus was inside the USA. The only knowledge of the virus, and one that made a significant impact, was a video showing the dark clouds of smoke over Wuhan and the ash cloud was reminiscent of the Nazi Gas Chambers and Gas Oven Crematoriums. That got the World’s attention. The 45th President, immediately, stopped air travel from China and brought the US economy to a half by furloughing many of its workers, across the USA. It may be, then, thought that the Democratic Party. would seek to seek to eliminate the virus and to get all the workers back to their places of employment. On the other hand it may be advantageous for the Democratic Party to keep the economy closed, until November.
The coronavirus kept the whole World tied down, and the weeks and months went by. As May of 2020 opened, the Coronavirus was still impacting the World but it was becoming clear that the virus was impacting the over 60’s with an existing medical problem and the governments of the US and UK began to action the protection of the very old and the return to work of everybody else whilst wearing face masks.

Then, on the 25th May, a black American was thought to have a counterfeit $20 bill in his possession when a transaction was attempted. The police were notified and whilst the police were on route the Black man got back into his car, where other black people were waiting. A police car arrived and stopped, to the rear of the stationary black man’s car Two police officers got out of the Police car and and, very unhurriedly, made their way, one to either of the front doors of the black man’s car. There was a security camera mounted on the wall opposite the stationary Police car accordingly the camera could only show the right hand door ( the passengers door) of the black man’s vehicle. The passengers then alighted following one policemans instruction and sat on the ground with their backs to the wall. One policemen opened the front passenger door and leaned right into the car, probably making contact with the driver. A moment or two later the Black driver came into the view of the video camera with the second policemen behind him. The black man was in handcuffs. The black man was a very big man, but appeared disoriented and off balance. A second police car appeared for a few moments and, in that time, the arresting policeman gave the second pair of police men a small item. The second police car, then, parked in a road which was at right angles to the road in which the arrest took place, The route to the second police car, and the second police car, were visible from the location of the first video camera, The two police men, that had recently arrived, then escorted George Floyd from the area where the first police was was stationed to the area were the second police car was stationed. A trio of 2 policemen and George Floyd could be seen crossing the major road and walking three abreast down to the second Police car. Then, the three, disappeared behind the profile of the second police car, which was parked looking towards the first police car. This video was shown to the public after the video in which a policeman had George Floyd pinned to the ground with his knee on George Floyds neck. The moment that George Floyd died, whilst the policeman’s knee was on his neck, is not clear and it is not clear if that section of the video was transmitted.

Once the news was broadcast and /or was spread by social media, the reaction by the general public was one of initial shock and, then, outrage. However, the overall situation in the US was one akin to a powder keg just waiting for a fuse to be lit. and the death of George Floyd was the spark which set the fuse alight. No doubt the thousands of activists saw an opportunity to embarrass the government and so they poured out onto the streets of all major and minor cities across the USA and then the World. Arson, rioting and looting broke out across the US and, then, who rode into town but “Antifa ‘, “Black Lives Matter ” and the “Black Panthers’ ‘. The rioting then focussed on the destruction of one statue associated with slavery and, then, the rolling wholesale destruction of stautes including those of Winston Churchill. Mount Rushmore was also on the list of targets, however, Trump signed an emergency order to severely penalise those committing the damage to statues. Groups, then, commenced to block off city centres, occupy and give the areas unique new names. In the UK parallel activities broke out. Police in both the US and the UK were powerless as their employers, the governors, gave the instruction that a light touch should be used or no touch at all.

As the World approaches the middle of July 2020, it is clear that a very dangereous situation has arisen. I will not attempt to explain what the dangereous sitiation is, as I feel sure readers will all have their own views, but I will show, here, the URL of two video presentations by Dr Steve Turley

The Pilgrims Choice

Posted on 2020/07/12 by Neil Howard Posted in Politics and War, The Hidden History

North America had been populated with the native tribes that formed the Wampanoag group for 10,000 years before ever a European set foot in the “New World”, as understood from the point of view of the “Old World”. In Northern England a group of people from the village of Scrooby, now understood as Yorkshire people and THE Pilgrims, had been placed under constant pressure to conform with the Church of Rome, which the then ruling class of England gave their support. The group had a member who was a regular visitor to Holland and eventually, the group left the port of Boston, England, to Amsterdam, Holland, to seek what they thought would be a better place to worship freely. England was not the free country we know of, and to leave England really had to be done in a clandestine way. However, the group made their way to Amsterdam in families, or ones and twos. They spent a few years in Amsterdam before moving on to Leiden, another city in Holland. The group spent 10 years in Holland before circumstances made them consider moving as a group to the New World. The group had grown in numbers as they boarded an old British ship called the “Speedwell”. The Speedwell set off from Holland headed towards the Eastern mouth of the English Channel. However, the ship sprung leaks and had to anchor and berth on the South Coast of England, to have the leaks repaired. The leaks being repaired, the Speedwell continued West down the English Channel. The Captain of the Speedwell determined that his ship would not survive the crossing of the Atlantic and put into Plymouth. It was at Plymouth that the group, now 100 strong, boarded their relief ship, the Mayflower, to cross the Atlantic.
The group had a very dangerous crossing of the Atlantic, losing some to disease, before landing on the North East Coast of the “New World”. The leading members of the group were not only carrying their own hopes for the future but also the hopes of a number of businessmen. These hopes could have been so easily dashed in the first months of the arrival of the group on the shores of “New England”. The arrival was after some 10 weeks on board the Mayflower, 66 days of which was crossing the Atlantic in the last quarter of 1620. It was November when the group saw the stern of the Mayflower disappear from their sight, over the horizon, on its voyage back to Plymouth, England The group, then, had to survive by hunting and fishing whilst building protective shelters. Further, the native tribes were not particularly welcoming to the new group, but this would change.
At this point, the leaders of the group had to make some very critical decisions. Should they set up their community similar to the large community around Scrooby, the leader’s home village, some 9 miles South of Doncaster, England, or should they set up in a different manner. There was, at that time, only two methods of set up ( and still are to this day). One method was to all contribute to a central store and thence distribute equally to all, regardless of individual contribution to the store, a socialist principle, or did they each farm a small holding and take their production to a central point where they would exchange their individual products with others who also had smallholdings, a capitalist principle. The leaders considered the small number in the community and made a decision to proceed on a sharing principle. However, other ships continued to arrive from the Old World and it soon became apparent, to the leaders of the group, that many new arrivals did not have the work ethic of the original group. The survival of the whole extended group now became threatened and conflict broke out as some new members wanted a share of the group’s resources without any input. The leaders, then, made a change to the way they operated the group, returning to the methods used in Scrooby. The fortunes of the settlement then stopped declining and began to rise rapidly. Each of the group could be understood as a minor capitalist and it is that principle that made the USA a great place to be born and to live.
Sadly, the new immigrant group had carried “Old World” diseases with them, to which they had an immunity through exposure, to the “New World” where the native of the Wampanoag had no immunity and soon the native population was decimated. There was one particular native, of the Patuxet tribe, who had bridged the divide between the native community and those of the leaders from the New World, who survived. His name was Squato. From that man and another named Samuset the Natives and the immigrants forged an alliance. That alliance was cemented in the culture of America by participating in a meal once a year, which was termed THANKSGIVING.
In 2020, some 400 years since the arrival of the immigrants and the setting up of their community, at a place named Port St Louis then changed to PLImouth, the people of America are divided. The division is seen in the voting pattern in which 50% of voters wish the Democratic party to prevail where 50% wish the Republican Party to prevail. With the population aged from, say, Zero to 100 years it may be understood that the mid range of 50 years of age divides the younger from the older population, Statistically, it may be put that the population is divided equally between the young/ inexperienced and old/experienced. That is generalizing but may have some worth to understand the problem of the extremes being seen in politics and the people’s views. From the year 1620 until 2012 any vote taken was understood by the majority, but also the minority, as a consensus. This long established and principled way forward was at first challenged in 2016 in both the UK and the USA, in both the Brexit campaign and the 45th Presidential Elections.
The last five years, in the Politics of the UK and the USA, the “Old World” and the “New World” have seen a shift in the overall wish of the people to revert back to the values of those that founded America and the British Isles as we know of them before the advent of Globalization. In a broader helicopter view, it sees culture as the main issue. The small village culture has seen an attempt to replace that culture with a centralised and overbearing global culture. The younger generation see this as tearing down the establishment, and taking a socialist course. I have,also, been told that “Accelerationism” will prevail. Accelerationist argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified – either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself. Accelerationism, therefore, goes against conservatism, traditional socialism, social democracy, environmentalism, protectionism, populism, nationalism, localism and all the other ideologies that have sought to moderate or reverse the already hugely disruptive, seemingly runaway pace of change in the modern world.

What cannot be contested is that each of us see each other in one of two ways. Those two ways are (a) I/ He/She works for my/his/her self or (b) I/ He/She works for another. Not seemingly to be understood, by the young and inexperienced, is that this understanding is the foundation of Capitalism and Socialism. The young and inexperienced see “Capitalism” as not any individual, such as possible they may be or become, but of the EXXONs, Shell. Pharmaceutical giants, big tech etc, and they naively understand that the money that these companies control is hidden under the beds. To be clear, Capitalism is that ideology that the Pilgrims put in place when Socialism failed. However, there is now a term of Crony Capitalism which infers large corporations making huge amounts of money. paying huge salaries to just a few at the top who control all the money. That is a price paid when a person is free to make his way in life without any interference from another group of people who may have a case but their primary case is based on jealousy. Nothwithsanding, THE PEOPLE should be able to arrive at a solution without killing the Golden Goose

The economic situation in the USA has been deteriorating for 30 years. I can nail its commencement to a time in the 1990s when I was speaking to a well read Process Engineer working for one of the only companies in the World that could deliver a Oil and Gas or Pharmaceutical facility. His words, supported by an article in the New York mainstream media, much later, was that this company had one foot in the ditch. In the mid 1990s the Engineering Manager of that company assembled all the Project Engineers, some 180 people, in a meeting room and declared that a new strategy was to be employed by the company. Reading from a few hand-written notes the Engineering Manager told all the assembled Project Engineers that the Company was to move to “Cheap Cost Centres”. From that moment on the big companies and the smaller supporting companies all bought into GLOBALIZATION, effectively exporting a large proportion of their jobs to third World countries and China. A recent event, of the export of Coronavirus from China, are making the need for a review of placing all trade eggs in one Chinese basket a strict requirement.

For the last 30 years America and Americans have had their wealth extracted, their power neutered and their flag desecrated and today, in June of 2020, there is an assault, from all sides, to remove the one man who sees it as it is, an attempt to destroy the USA in favour of a socialist state, so long planned for by China and Marxists. The rioting and rising up of many of the population, could be argued as a result of a democratically placed man, in the ultimate position of power, being seen as having an agenda to subvert America using a combination of the influence of Russia and China. That has proved to be a totally false understanding being broadcast by the left wing media in both the UK and the USA. However, the unrest could have been the result of a longer term plan that originated in Europe in the 1970s. At that time the Communist Party, swollen with pride in its takeover of Russia began to understand that, post WWII, Europe was showing a declining interest in the Socialist/ Communist dream of one man at the top and the rest doing what they were simply told to do. However, many, like my ex brother-in-law, believed that Marxism was and still is the way forward to this day, but never wishing to leave his comfortable job, as a UK social worker paid for by the state, and emigrate to Russia. In the 1970’s the top people in the Communist Party, now given free reign to travel in Europe and the USA decided to put down the hammer and sickle and pick up the ability to teach in universities. It started in a small way. Universities survived on Government grants and hence employees in Universities were effectively State Employees. They were not going to leave the comfort of a University chair to attempt to become a successful entrepreneur or business person unless they retired and still needed to make a living. That ruled out most teacher’s ever supporting the notion of being a conservative. The Marxists were well on the road to turning over Capitalism in favour of Communism. Jacques Derrida was an Algerian-born French philosopher best known for developing a form of semiotic analysis known as deconstruction, which he discussed in numerous texts, and developed in the context of phenomenology. He is one of the major figures associated with post-structuralism and postmodern philosophy. This last paragraph is taken from the Wikipedia web page and is a form of deception to hide Derrida’s real purpose in life. He taught communism to newbie teachers. So, some 50 years later, it should come as no surprise to anyone that teachers are very predominantly left wing, the civil services are left wing, government employees are left wing. Hence, the universities have taken on Identity politics, grouping people into handy sizes under various “Hate” tags and then not allowing that group to protest as that group belongs to category “H” for Hate and should be on route to some chamber soon.

I go through various stages when arriving at an understanding. I begin with “I think”. Given that I receive sufficient independent support for what “I think”, I can move that thought to my “I believe” category. After that, the receipt of a lot more independent documentation and proof I may then move my “I believe” to my “I KNOW” category. I do not “know” very much but what I “believe” is built of sound foundations. I have written this post and place it in the blog to give you one point of view on a very difficult situation that is slowly, but surely, manifesting itself. In writing it I am aware that it may ruffle some feathers, however, I would sooner ruffle feathers than let a disastrous course be followed without some thought

The “Brown Shirts,” (Sturmabteilung, Storm Troopers), were the Nazi Party militia that helped Adolf Hitler rise to power in Germany. Created in 1922, the SA’s supposed purpose was to guard Nazi Party meetings, but in actuality, Hitler meant for the group to serve as the Nazi army. Bearing in mind it is a lifetime since brownshirts first runabout, firstly, destroying property, then robbing people, then killing people individually, then hauling them off to gas chambers. It would be folly to think that could,never happen again. We are currently onto the book burning phase

What is clear is that history is no longer seen as relevant by those who set the curriculums for the young, and the old adage of THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW HISTORY ARE BOUND TO REPEAT IT or ,simply, not be aware of some history as to where we are today

WE THE PEOPLE

Posted on 2019/09/07 by Neil Howard Posted in English, Misc, Politics and War, The Hidden History

It was a lifetime ago that the World was faced with an Austrian born man who wished to control the lives of all those he was able. His name was Adolph Hitler. He came to the attention of the leaders and peoples of the World when he began to turn Germany’s armed forces into his own militia. To gain momentum for his views, he looked to the Jewish population of Germany and advised the German People that the reason for Germany not being a Super-Power was because the Jews controlled the flow of money in Germany and, indeeed, in every other country. Further, the German people were told that the 1914-1918 war was brought down on them by Great Britiain. There was nothing factual in his allegations, however, the German people listened and allowed him to pursue his goals to make the Germans the Master race, the supreme race, in the World. There, then, came the Second World War.

With Germany beaten, in two World Wars, the other countries of Europe came to a conclusion that the control of coal and steel, two key materials in the making of a war machine, should be manditory . This control was brought about and the number of controlled items was further expanded by a small group of countries who advanced the proposition of a Common Market, the purpose of which was to take away the driving force of failing economies in Europe to turn to war, hence avoiding World War III. The threat of War had made the free capitals of Europe come up with a sound idea, so it seemed. However, those who had brought the Common Market (ECC) to life, in doing so, had in their minds a more grander Idea to construct a larger ecomomy, and army, to defend from the ever growing threat from emerging Russia. Their vision cumulated in rebadging the ECC as the European Union (EU). The ECC was formed in 1957 and the EC in 1973 and the UK joined the EC in 1973 and later the EC was changed to the EU without the people being asked, by referendum, if this was the route they wished to take. Not seeking to identify the peoples wishes, then, led to 50% of the Conservative MP making it known of their reservations about handing over control of the the UK reins to a group of unelected commisioneres, who now formed the governing body of the EU, Accordingly, every time a General Election was called, the leader of the Conservative Party knew that he had always an uphill struggle of attempting to win a General Election, whilst many of his MPs wanted to take back control of the reins, of the UK, from the EU

In 2016 a General Election was mooted and the leader of the Conservative Party, David Cameron, decided to attempt to draw the horns, of those MPs who were against the EU, by trying to negotiate those contentious words, in the Treaties between the EU and the UK, in an attempt to pacify those MPs who wanted to regain the control of British affairs. As the General Election came closer, Daviid Cameron was very aware that the views of Nigel Farage, were now a drumbeat across the UK. Nigel Farage had for many years advocated that the UK should leave the EU. Cameron shuttled back and forth between London and Brussels for months without any gains. It was a replay of the then Prime Minister Chamberlain of the UK, shuttling back and forward between Berlin and London, in an attempt to agree with Hitler terms to avoid a World War II. Much like Chamberlain, David Cameron was given absolutely zero by the unelected commisioners of the EU. To any reasonable person, the question would be “Why would the EU give the UK a better set of Terms and Conditions than the other now 27 countries of the EU?”. For what sane reason would the EU give an inch to someone leaving the club.

The General Election was fought and the Conservatives won easily and now David Cameron had to deliver on his promise to allow the People a referendum on whether to “Leave” or “Remain” in the EU. David Cameron clearly had in his mind that his belief that the People would vote to “Remain” in the EU. It was not a risk. He was wrong. The people voted 17.4 to 16.1 million in favour of leaving the EU. With David Cameron no longer being seen as representative of the views of the People he had to resign as Prime Minister. However, he picked his sucessor before he resigned and his sucessor had also voted to “Remain” in the EU. His successor was Theresa May a known person to the UK public On the day she took over from David Cameron she stood at the lecturn outside of No 10 Downing Stree and assured the People that she would deliver on the referedum to leave the EU. It is my conjecture that she returned to her new home, that evenng, after a very exciting an exhaustting day and discussed with her husband a very deep problem. The problem was that she had for many years supported the EU project and today she had told the People that she would work to take the UK out of the EU which was totally at odds with her belief. It is my opinion that, in the kitchen of No10 Downing Street, on the night of 13th July 2016 she made a decision to examine all the Treaties between the EU and the UK to come up with a Treaty, a form of words , that, to the People, would deliver their expectations whilst maintaning almost the status quo between the EU and the UK. In my opinion, her aim was that that she was to bring about a reversal of the Peoples referedum without the People understanding that was the reality.

Mrs May then called another General Election, almost immedialety she had taken over the post of Prime Minister.. The reality on the ground, to all MPs of all parties, was that if they did not support “LEAVE” then they would not get the support of the People and therefore their lucrative jobs would end, their carrers would end. Accordingly, it is believed that many MPs, in their hearts, were “Remainers”, however, to secure their seat in Parliament, they told their supporters that they would support “Leave”. It may be that in the future the history books will show one of the most disturbing frauds ever committed on the British People was by those people that they trusted.

In the statements and interviews of the Prime Minister, when asked about her negotations, she introduced the term “No deal is better than a bad deal”. An ambiguous statement but inferring that if the EU would not change the Terms and Condtions of the UK to a position similar to that before the Masstricht Treaty, then this would lead to the UK leaving the EU without any agreed change of relationship. It is believed that PM May coluded with the EU to write a new Treaty, known widely as the “Withdrawl Agreement” . It was at a time when PM May summoned her MPs to Lancaster House that feeling were running high both in the House of Commons and the country as a whole. She gave her MPs assuances which they accepted that her negotiations were on track. For a short time, the MPs were calmed but, then, out of the blue, she called another meeting at Chequers and, then, sacked the negotiating team and replaced the outgoing team with a team from the Civil Service, lead by Olly Robbins. and her “Withdrawal” document was launched, probably written by Olly Robins in conjunction with Mr Barnier of the EU

In parallel, in the House of Commons, the labour party, led by an out and out Communist Jeremy Corbyn with another Communist as his right hand man John Macdonnald, was manouvering to depose the Conseravative governement. What became clear was that the Labour Party MPs who were “remainers” really could not allow the people who sent them to Parliament as “pro Leave” to find they were against leaving, so they hid behind the fig leaf of being opposed to a “no deal”.

For the next three years Prime Minister May, a staunch “remainer”, would sit down with the EU team members, all staunch “remainers”, and negotiate a new Treaty to keep the UK tied to the EU in perpetuity. It was a course of action that was doomed to failure as cold eyes, in the Conservatives, with the support of Nigel Farage, began to understand the the documents that Theresa May had in her case were a sham.

PM May brough her Withdrawal Bill to the house on three separate occasions, each time with the content slightly changed in accordance with the wishes of the Speaker and the house rules. Each time, it was rejected by huge majorities comprising of MPs from all Parties. The Withdrawal Bill was seen by the hard right as not freeing the UK from all the bonds of the EU. The centre ground was made up of those who had turncoated against the Peoples wishes completely. The hard left were those leaders and MPs who were totally dedicated to bring the governement down to further of their leftist agendas. In a nutshell, only a small number of MPs actually were working to deliver the will of the people which was to “leave the EU, deal or no deal, either way it was leave the EU”. The leaders of the Parites in the House of Commons, the majority of MPs and the BBC corporation, all paid from taxpayer money, where not ever going to carry out the expressed will,of the PEOPLE which was simply to LEAVE the EU

With PM May failing to deliver the wishes of the PEOPLE her support wilted in Parlaiment and across the country. She had to resign and a new Conservative Prime Minister , Boris Johnson, was invited by the Queen to form a new Cabinet. PM Johnson made a statement to the people that the UK is leaving the EU on the 31st October Deal or No Deal. Johnson’s window of time was short and there were many roads down which he may or may drive a coach and horses carrying the wishes of the British People to cross the line outside of the control of the EU. What was clear that the number of possible roads, that Johnson may take, all had to be blocked by the Labour party, which had got itself into a total mess on exactly what it supported, what it gave the impression of supporting, whilst questioning the very leadership of the Labour party, which was communist. In one last desperate attempt to block a “No Deal” when leaving of the EU a document was hurridly drafted by the labour party and sent to the House of Lords for scrutiny and acceptance. Whilst the drafting was in hand the Shadow Prime Minister, Jermy Corbyn, a communist, was asked by PM Boris Johnson, at the dispatch box, ” I am offering you the opportunty for a General Election will you take it?.” Corbyn repied ” No, the document to stop you doing a No Deal Exit from the EU must be passed into law before I agree to a General Election” In a parallel event featuring ” Question Time”, Thornberry was asked what she would do if the Labour party was to win an election and she went to Brussels to negotiate a deal. Thornberry reponded that she would return to London, with a great deal, which would be passed by the House of Commons and then the Labour party would seek to win an Election with a mandate to cancel BREXIT. The Question Time host was stopped in her tracks and could not believe what she had just heard, so she asked for clarification, and received the same response.
Clearly, the House of Commons comprises of Labour MPs who speak with forked tongues and want to no avoid a “no deal by cancelling BREXIT altogether. The Conservative Party has a large number of MPs who also speak with forked tongues who say they are working against a no deal but are actually working to stop BREXIT, whilst the SNP simply want to Derail BREXIT, or if BREXIT were to happen then to leave the Union and stay in the EU independently.

On Monday , 9th Septemeber 2019, the House Of Commons is expected to meet and the Labour Party are expecting the Queens ascent to the BILL which is written to a) Rule out a No Deal b) Instruct Boris Johnson to travel to Brussels with a letter asking the EU to ask the EU for an extension with a date and c) should the EU not accept the date the EU can give a date which the Prime Minister of the UK must accept. Not withstanding, written into the statute, the UK will leave the EU on the 31st October. Acccrodingly, any change to that date has to be by a) the agreement of all the member states of the EU b) the agreement of the House of Commons and the House of Lords c) the Queen.
The Bottom line being that the the PEOPLE were asked to vote in a referedum to either Leave or Remain in the EU. The PEOPLE voted to Leave the EU with no mention of a deal being required to leave the EU. The introduction of the word deal by Theresa May was the first step in providing those supporting REMAIN to have a lever to sow uncertainty into the process. This lever has been used for three years to simply stall the process, in the view of corrupt politicians that by stalling the process, the will of the PEOPLE can be turned over in favour of those who lost the referendum. The Current Prime Minister has vowed that in no circumstances will he ask the EU for another extension. The EU has indicated that for the EU to allow a further extension there must be a strong reason to do so , not simply to draw out the process in favour of a result not favoured by the PEOPLE. However, in the National Press, the BBC and the independent media, there is speculation that the Prime Minister will go to jail if he does not comply with the rushed through Bill which simply hands over the UK to the EU. There is also just cause to say that the Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow has interfered with his biased interetations of the role of Speaker and allowed several actions to stop the BREXIT process and therefore stop the will of the people.
The UK is now in very dangerous times. The People are split in their view that a) it is in the interest of the UK to stay in the EU or b) it is in the intersts of the UK to leave the EU However, by a democratic vote the PEOPLE said it is in the intersts of the UK to leave the EU . That view was the collected view of the MPs, elected before they returned to Parliament They were trusted to carry out the separation of the UK from the EU but once ensconced in the House they then dropped any pretense of carrying out the PEOPLE’s will on the basis that either they knew better or that a no deal was to hazardous. Both these posiitons are not following the PEOPLEs instruction to LEAVE the EU.
On Monday 9th September the UK will enter into a very dark place. There may well be a constitutional crisis which may paralyse the country and for which the MPs have no expereince of handling. This possibility needs to be address before it occurs and for this, Governemnts of the day, have already put in place a system and documentation that should be followed.

Before writing further let me relate events in the House of Lords on Friday 6th September which were broadcasr live on the Parliament channel
One well know Lord had introduced an amendment to the bill which was bring rushed through the Lords in order to prevent an alleged catasrophe if a “No Deal” at the UK leaving date was still the position. The amendment being discussed was to change the wording of a particular clause. The Lord introducing the amendement gave very sound reasons why the clause should be changed but, the wisdom of the majority of the Lords, was that there would be no time to make the change as the House of Parliament would be proroged the following week. A second Lord had introduced a second ammendment and in explaining the reason for the change to the clause he described those who put forward the BIll as “remainers”. Another Lord objected to the use of the word “remainers” and wanted the Lord introducung the amemndment to use the words “No dealers”. To this, the Lord introducing the amendment replied “we all know that they are remainers”. Later, in the proceedings, what I would describe as a genuine working class Lord, who had been given the role of steering the bill through the House of Lords, vented a great deal of frustration due to the poor quality and lack of care in drafting the bill. After several harsh words about the contents and about the quality he said ” this is not our job to sort this out, Sent it back to the Commons. It is their mess” . He then went on to say a very clear statement, “It is BREXIT in name only, anyway”
What has happened is that the Commons has failed to do its duty, and Senior politicians are working for their own personal needs and outcomes rather than the PEOPLEs, who they have so badly let down

Clearly, there is anger and division in Parliament and the Country but these have been stoked, to white heat, by an elite that believes their views checkmate the views of the PEOPLE. Three years of deceit, lies, counter lies and corruption have led to Monday 9th September 2019 when the safetly valve may not be sufficient to stop a very significant crisis across the UK.
There may be very just cause, on Monday 9th September, to reflect on words in the COBR documentation and associated relevent documents as folows>
Severe disruption arising from conflict situations are fundementally different from those that arise from concensual situations, whilst definitions of a disaster mention that an event, as a catalyst, but focussed explicityly on the concomitant failure of the social system to deliver reasonable condiitons of life.
Prime Minister Johnson may be faced, early in the week, commencing 9th Septemebt 2019, with an unfolding scenario where there is a disaster emerging on several fronts. He could then call a National Disaster Emergecy meeting of COBR and put into action what ever recovery measures are necessary to ensure the safey of the People and the Country of the United Kingdom

This URL is the Emergency Procedure Document on which COBR actshttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192425/CONOPs_incl_revised_chapter_24_Apr-13.pdf